|
Listen to this article
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
BLUF :: Marketing teams spend 25% of their budget on technology but use just 33% of its capabilities. Zero of 50 Fortune 500 CMOs could explain why. The bottleneck isn’t the platform – it’s the person behind it. Here’s the data and three corporate case studies that prove it.
You are about to renew a technology platform you’re under-using.
And the instinct is to fix that by buying something better.
That instinct is the problem. Utilization has fallen from 58% to 33% as martech investment has doubled. More tech hasn’t moved the needle. The fix starts with the person sitting in front of the tool you already have.
How do you improve martech ROI through talent development?
01
Delegate outcomes, not tasks.
Stop telling your team what to do. Tell them what success looks like and get out of the way. The person who figures out how grows ten times faster. It also surfaces who has genuine strategic instinct – the quality no platform can manufacture.
02
Build development conversations into the operating rhythm.
Don’t wait for a performance problem. A quarterly development conversation – separate from reviews, is the single most cited driver of employee loyalty in Gallup’s research. It also closes the martech capability gap faster than any training module.
03
Sequence the investment :: people capability before platform capability.
Coca-Cola, Unilever, and IBM all followed the same sequence. They developed the humans first, then deployed technology to amplify what they can already do. Build the capability. Then buy the tool to accelerate it.
04
Measure talent ROI the same way you measure platform ROI.
What does it cost when a skilled marketing technologist leaves 18 months into a major implementation? What does it cost to run a $50K platform at 33% utilization for three years? These numbers are calculable. Most marketing leaders haven’t calculated them. That needs to change.
The 10-minute martech capability audit
Run this before your next renewal. For each major platform, answer 5 questions ::
1. Who owns this tool day-to-day? Name them. If you can’t, or if that person left recently, you have a talent problem, not a tech problem.
2. Are they using it operationally or strategically? Operational = runs the report. Strategic = knows what question to ask before pulling it.
3. What percentage of this tool’s capability is your team actually using? Estimate it honestly. Below 50%? Ask why before renewing.
4. What development has this person received in the last 12 months? If the answer is “the vendor onboarded us at implementation” … you have your answer.
5. If this person left tomorrow, what would happen to the value of this platform? If it would effectively stop working, the risk sits in your talent pipeline, not your tech stack.
Score ::
- 4–5 strong answers → technology may genuinely be your ceiling. Upgrade with confidence.
- 2–3 strong answers → capability gap. Invest in development before the next renewal.
- 0–1 strong answers → the new tool will not solve this. Start with the person.


Why does martech under-perform despite record investment?
Utilization has fallen every year as martech spending has climbed.
58%
of martech capabilities used in 2020
42%
in 2022
33%
in 2023
McKinsey interviewed approximately 50 senior marketing leaders at Fortune 500 companies, not one could clearly articulate their martech ROI (McKinsey, Rewiring Martech, 2025).
These are the most resourced marketing teams in the world.
The top barriers Gartner identifies for martech under-performance are complexity of the ecosystem, customer data challenges, inflexible governance.
Every one is a people and process failure — not a platform failure.
Only 13% of martech budgets are typically allocated to people – training, development, capability-building (University of Southampton Business School).
The other 87% funds licenses that sit at 33% utilization. That ratio is the problem.
AI doesn’t replace human skill. It reveals who had it.
The marketer who understood positioning before AI moves ten times faster with it. The one who was coasting on templates? Now coasting faster. Your stack amplifies what’s already there.
On talent ROI, the numbers are equally clear.
None of that comes from a software license.
Highly engaged teams are 21% more profitable with 41% lower absenteeism
(Gallup)
99% of organisations with effective talent management outperform competitors – vs. 56% of all others
(McKinsey)
Companies investing in development see a 24% higher profit margin
(Assoc. for Talent Development)
How did Coca-Cola, Unilever, and IBM improve martech ROI by investing in people?
Same pattern. Every time
How Coca-Cola grew digital media spend from 30% to 65% — by starting with its people.
Coca-Cola faced a growing digital skills gap.
Instead of deploying new tools into an under-prepared workforce, they built a Digital Academy – training 500+ managers in year one.
Graduates implemented 20+ digital approaches across 10+ sites.
Productivity improved more than 20%.
Marketing’s digital media mix then shifted from less than 30% to approximately 65% of total spend by 2024 (Coca-Cola Growth Strategy Report, 2024).
The platform followed the capability. Not the other way around.

How Unilever cut attrition below market rate for three consecutive years — by building 70% of its talent rather than renting it.
Unilever made an explicit policy to build 70% of talent internally, buy 30% externally.
They invested in a Marketing Academy, individual development plans, and an internal talent marketplace.
Results were attrition below market rates for three consecutive years, employee engagement up 1,000 basis points over five years (CIPD), and one factory site cutting absenteeism by 60% while boosting productivity by 16% (Unilever/WEF, 2025).

How IBM grew priority offerings 20% faster than the rest of the business – by up-skilling its people before scaling its platforms.
IBM had the tools. Their sales and marketing team didn’t have the skills to use them.
So they upskilled first — rebranding inside sales as IBM Digital Sales and building a structured digital selling programme before scaling the platforms.
Outcome was 50% improvement in seller confidence, priority offerings growing 20% faster than the rest of the business, asset production up 7x.

When is the technology actually the problem — not the talent?
The argument here isn’t that technology doesn’t matter. It does. There are real cases where the platform is the constraint – legacy infrastructure that blocks integration, a missing category tool, genuine vendor failure.
When a capable team hits a technology ceiling, upgrading is exactly the right call.
The test is simple … if your most capable person used your current stack at 80% of its potential, would you still need the new tool? If the honest answer is no — start with the person, not the platform.
What should marketing leaders do differently to fix martech ROI?
Most marketing teams are over-invested in platforms and under-invested in people.
The fix isn’t to stop buying technology. It’s to sequence the investment correctly.
Run the audit. Find the capability gap. Build the development plan. Then buy the platform to accelerate what your team can already do.
Coca-Cola did it. Unilever did it. IBM did it. The data is consistent. Your stack is only as powerful as the people behind it.

Frequently Asked Questions
According to Gartner’s 2023 Martech Survey, organizations use just 33% of their martech stack’s capabilities on average. This is down from 42% in 2022 and 58% in 2020 – meaning utilization has declined every year while investment has increased. Gartner identifies the top barriers as ecosystem complexity, customer data challenges, and inflexible governance – all of which are people and process failures, not technology failures.
McKinsey’s Rewiring Martech report (2025) found that not one of approximately 50 senior marketing leaders at Fortune 500 companies could clearly articulate the ROI of their organization’s martech investment. The core problem is that most marketing teams measure operational metrics – email sends, open rates, campaign delivery – rather than connecting martech investment directly to revenue growth, customer lifetime value, or strategic business outcomes. Martech ROI is hard to measure because the measurement framework is wrong, not because the ROI isn’t there.
Gartner research consistently identifies three barriers: complexity of the martech ecosystem, customer data challenges, and inflexible governance. All three are fundamentally people and process problems.
The deeper issue is that just 13% of martech budgets are typically allocated to people – training, development, and capability-building – while 87% funds licenses that sit underutilized (University of Southampton Business School). The ratio of platform spend to people spend is the primary driver of low utilization.
Talent development improves martech ROI by closing the capability gap between what a tool can do and what the person operating it can extract from it. Coca-Cola trained 500+ people in digital skills before deploying new technology and saw productivity improve by over 20%. IBM upskilled its sales team before scaling its digital platforms and grew priority offerings 20% faster than the rest of the business. Unilever built 70% of its talent internally rather than buying it, and sustained attrition below market rates for three consecutive years. In each case, people development preceded and enabled technology ROI.
The 5 Shifts framework, developed by marketing strategist Nicola Ziady, is a model for marketing leadership development built on the premise that every advance in team performance starts with how a person thinks, not what tool they use.
The five shifts are: from Tactics to Strategy, from Reacting to Anticipating, from Tools to Systems, from Managing to Multiplying, and from Data to Insight.
Shift 4, From Managing to Multiplying, is most directly linked to martech ROI, because a team of multiplying leaders uses a modest stack at high efficiency, while a team of task-executors under-uses even a premium one.
Technology is genuinely the bottleneck when a capable team hits a ceiling that training and development cannot resolve. Legitimate technology constraints include legacy infrastructure that prevents system integration, missing category tools (no CRM, no attribution platform), compliance or security limitations, and vendor failure.
The practical test: if your most capable person used your current stack at 80% of its potential, would you still need the new tool? If the honest answer is no, the bottleneck is capability, not technology.
A martech capability audit maps each tool in a team’s stack to the human capability required to extract value from it. Unlike a standard martech audit, which checks licenses, features, and renewal dates, a capability audit asks 5 questions per platform: Who owns this tool day-to-day? Are they using it operationally or strategically? What percentage of the tool’s capability is the team actually using? What development has this person received in the last 12 months? If this person left tomorrow, what would happen to the value of this platform?
The audit takes approximately 10 minutes per platform and identifies whether the real ROI problem is a technology gap or a talent gap.
According to Gartner’s CMO Spend and Strategy Survey 2023, marketing technology accounts for 25.4% of the average marketing budget – the single largest line item, ahead of paid media (25.6% was paid media combined), labour, and agencies.
Despite being the largest budget category, martech produces the lowest utilisation rate of any major marketing investment, at 33% of capabilities used (Gartner 2023).
About the Author ::
About the Author Nicola Ziady is Chief Marketing Officer at the University of Cincinnati and a marketing strategist with 20+ years across healthcare and higher education. She writes at the intersection of leadership, people potential, and modern marketing strategy. nicolaziady.com. Connect with Nicola on LinkedIn.
Article Information ::
Published: March 26 2026
Author: Nicola Ziady